|
|
|
| What can we learn from Ontologists |
||
| when constructing UBL?
[2] |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • | Theory
of formal distinctions & connections about |
||||||||||||||
| entities,
relations, categories |
|||||||||||||||
| • | Properties:
identity, rigidity, unity; what changes, what |
||||||||||||||
| remains
same? |
|||||||||||||||
| • | Part-whole
relations: mereotopology, aggregation, |
||||||||||||||
| mass/count
(plurality) |
|||||||||||||||
| • | Levels:
physical, functional, biological, intentional, |
||||||||||||||
| social |
|||||||||||||||
| • | Taxonomic
constraints |
||||||||||||||
| • | Property
analysis: legal agent, group, social entity, |
||||||||||||||
| organization |
|||||||||||||||
