ppy/ontolog_chat-transcript_edited_20111020b.txt Chat transcript from room: ontolog_20111020 2011-10-20 GMT-08:00 ----------------------------- [09:27] PeterYim: Welcome to the = Joint IAOA-OOR-Ontolog "Ontologies and Standards" mini-series: session-1 - Tue 2011_10_20 = Topic: Introducing the ISO/WD 17347 "OntoIOp" Co-chairs: Professor JohnBateman (Bremen University) & Professor MichaelGruninger (University of Toronto) Goto session page at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2011_10_20 Mute/Unmute: moderator will mute everyone; raise your hand (with "hand button" at lower right) "*3" to unmute yourself; "*2" to go back into mute after you speak . == Proceedings: == . anonymous morphed into ChristopherSpottiswoode ChristophLange: hi, this is ChristophLange. OliverKutz and MichaelGruninger are with me; we will use one phone together, but separate chats anonymous morphed into TillMossakowski ChristophLange: i'm back in the phone conf PeterYim: Michael ... please speak up ChristopherSpottiswoode: I'm here but can't hear anyone. PeterYim: @ChristopherSpottiswoode - the session has just started, can you hear us yet? anonymous morphed into TimBoland anonymous morphed into FabianNeuhaus ChristopherSpottiswoode: @PeterYim: I have just seen your question... Yes all's fine, thanks! PeterYim: @ChristophLange - ref. your comment on access to working draft(s) ... please elaborate on how that would work, for onotio-wg members, and the wider ontology community PeterYim: @ChristophLange - don't worry about answering now, I am (and encouraged for others too) just capturing question while you are presenting, so we can address them later, during the Q&A and discussion segment PeterYim: [action] - to get process in place to allow more people to contribute and provide feedback during the working draft phase AliHashemi: question for later, re slide 7: where would SWRL (and the other rule formalisms) be located on the graphic in slide 7? AliHashemi: related to it, are there plans underway to include them as conforming logics TillMossakowski: actually, we have not looked closer into rule formalism yet, but this is the next thing we want to do MichaelGruninger: @AliHashemi: SWRL with monotonic semantics is a subset of FOL. Technically, SWRL is an extension of OWL (i.e. it specifies that SWRL atoms are equivalent to OWL classes and roles). AliHashemi: (well same question for RIF which contains extra-logical bits) MichaelGruninger: @AliHashemi: Can you give additional examples of "extra-logical bits"? AliHashemi: I should be clear by what I mean by "extra-logic" - take the URD dialect for example AliHashemi: ( http://c4i.gmu.edu/ursw/2008/papers/URSW2008_F9_ZhaoBoley.pdf ) AliHashemi: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/ AliHashemi: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RIF_Working_Group AliHashemi: http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl MatthewWest: I'm afraid I have to leave. interesting session. PeterYim: thank you for coming, Matthew ... ttyl MikeBennett: I have to go now - thanks for great presentations and I'll be following this work with interest. SteveRay: [regarding the ISO process -ed.] No comment at this point. ChristophLange: (for those on [ontoiop-wg]) link to Michael's examples: http://interop.cim3.net/file/work/OntoIOp/Ontologies/ ChristophLange: (for those on [ontoiop-wg]) link to the e-mail thread discussing these examples: http://interop.cim3.net/forum/ontoiop-wg/2011-10/msg00086.html JoelBender: @SteveRay: are you involved in this effort? JoelBender: I am involved in ASHRAE/NEMA SPC 201P, under the auspices of NIST, developing a model for information transfer between facilities and a national smart grid. One of the stickier problems is the mapping of "space", "time", "measure" - specifically the terminology as published by NOAA (OpenGIS), WS-Calendar (OASIS), IEC 61850, and semantic sensor networks (W3C), and units of measure (OASIS - eventually). Any help out of DOL would be appreciated! SteveRay: My team has translated the entire ASHRAE SPC201P into OWL and is grinding through it, looking for overlaps, duplications, inconsistencies. SteveRay: @MichaelGruninger - Interested in who is leading the IDIOM project. MichaelGruninger: @SteveRay - David Price, David Leal, and Allison Barnard Feeney are actually the editors of the IDIOM document that I have. SteveRay: @MichaelGruninger - Excellent! Thanks. JoelBender: Here is another project, which is more taxonomy rather than ontology, http://project-haystack.org/ - I don't think the information is available in a formal notation ChristophLange: @JoelBender: Could you also provide some links to the space/time/measure terminologies/ontologies? TerryLongstreth: Is Sue Ellen's preso on the wiki yet? JohnBateman: @Terry: the slides are there... MichaelGruninger: join us at the next session of this "Ontologies and Standards" mini-series - developing details at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2011_11_03 PeterYim: Great session! JoelBender: Thank you (good to "see" you again Peter) PeterYim: @Joel - yes, glad you are here! [11:12] PeterYim: - session ended: 11:11am PDT ------------------------------