ppy/cew-63_prep-msg_20070709a.txt Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:22:09 -0700 From: "Peter Yim" To: "susan.turnbull@gsa.gov" , "Peter Yim" , "Steve Ray" , "Obrst, Leo J." , "Olken, Frank" , "Denise Bedford" , "Elisa F. Kendall" , "Ken Baclawski" , "Doug Holmes" , "Josh Lubell" , "Rachuri Sudarsan" , "Rex Brooks" , "Bob Smith" Subject: Preparation for the two Ontolog panels at CEW#63 - date:17 & 18-Jul-2007 - venue: NSF (Arlington, VA) All, Thanks to all for your positive response support the opportunity for us to make our case at the upcoming Collaborative Expedition Workshop (CEW#63) organized by Susan Turnbull that will take place on 17 & 18-Jul-2007 at NSF (Arlington, VA) . Susan program for the two-day workshop (as it has evolved up to this point) is at: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ExpeditionWorkshop/TowardsStabilityInInformationSharing_2007_07_17 The plan, as previously mentioned is for Ontolog to put together two panels and make a contribution towards: (a) using OntologySummit2007 as a case, share the lessons learned in delivering a collaborative virtual community project like it, and how that knowledge can be captured and preserved. (7/17 panel) (b) try to make a compelling argument on the role of ontologies in information and records management. (7/18 panel) To facilitate our preparation work, we should use this e-mail thread to exchange and discuss our plans. I have also started a wiki page to capture our thoughts, inputs and progress. The wiki page is at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_FollowUp/CewPanel Everyone is invited to use EITHER or BOTH the e-mail thread and the wiki page to communicate his/her thoughts (although the e-mail thread will be the normative "conversation" platform; therefore, after you have made a significant post onto the wiki, do highlight it to all via the email thread.) I have made my best attempt to capture inputs and status to-date onto the page already. I will (or anyone else, please) will try to capture the salient points conclusions from that discussion to the wiki page so that everyone, as well as the rest of the community, can be posted. At the workshop, I envisage having (for each of the two panel segments): (i) a couple of anchor briefings (with slides) that will frame the discussion, (ii) then go around the panel, with the panelists bringing up other salient points that address the subject (using no, or at the most 1~3 slides), and to collaboratively deliver our message, and then (iii) open up to Q & A and discussion from the floor. I have already highlighted 3 anchor briefing pieces under content (see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_FollowUp/CewPanel#nid12S4 ) on the page so far. I solicit further suggestions and refinement as to the following: (a) salient points that we want to deliver; and suggestions on who would address them. (b) if you have a compelling briefing that will add value to the overall message, please make your suggestion along with a title and a brief abstract. After a few rounds of discussion (which we will conclude by end-of-day this Wednesday 7/11), we will then draw up an agenda, so that everyone can proceed to get prepared for the panel presentation on their own. We will also collect the draft or final presentations and talking points and will share them on our shared-file workspace at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/wip/cew-63/ so that everyone can be on the same page. Since we are running a tight schedule (partially my fault), I solicit your input to the above (a) & (b) ASAP (like now!). Thanks and regards. =ppy --